Recent Highlights

Share
Posted in News | Comments Off

UKLA Breakout Sessions at UKSG

Bournemouth: rather lovely.

Last week, the annual UKSG Conference was held in Bournemouth, England.  The conference programme includes a mixture of plenary, lightning talks, and breakout sessions.

Together with Fred Guy, project manager of the Keepers Registry, I jointly presented a breakout session entitled E-journals and long-term availability: an overview and panel discussion on the archiving infrastructure to meet the needs of users.  Over the two sessions this event attracted well over 60 delegates.

The session was separated into two components.  To begin, brief presentations described the role of the Keepers Registry (view slides) and the UK LOCKSS Alliance (view slides) in helping libraries move towards e-only environments.

Following this, a panel session was held to offer insights into the activity taken by libraries to treat electronic collections as sustainable, move towards e-only environments, and responsibly discard unrequired print collections.  The panel comprised David Prosser (Research Libraries UK – RLUK), Lorraine Estelle (Jisc), Joanne Farrant (Cambridge University), and Bill Barker (London School of Economics).

An engaging panel session

A great write-up of the breakout session highlights key issues discussed by the engaging panel, noting in particular: “unanimous agreement that e-journal preservation services have given libraries the confidence to firstly cancel print subscriptions and secondly to dispose of back-runs.”

Share
Posted in Events, News | Comments Off

UKLA Case Studies now available

The UK LOCKSS Alliance has published three case studies exploring the benefits of the LOCKSS approach for e-journal preservation.

The case studies confirm the value of the LOCKSS approach:  with an alternative source of supply under library control, the LOCKSS approach gives academics and librarians greater confidence in e-only journal environments.  Once a local LOCKSS archive is integrated with link resolver systems, the library has invested in a powerful tool for the preservation and continuing access of e-journal content.

Key highlights from the case studies include:

“The reliability of LOCKSS as a source of content to address short-term outages instills confidence in its reliability as a long-term preservation solution.” - De Montfort University Case Study


“The LOCKSS box is held locally and thus is under the control of the library. The library decides what to archive.”University of Warwick Case Study


“It’s reassuring for users to see the content in the box as evidence that it is safely preserved and can be accessed.” - London School of Economics and Political Science Case Study

Case study participants were given an opportunity to discuss future development of the LOCKSS software, and we are happy to report that a number of the suggested improvements are being addressed as part of ongoing development. These include:

  • Support for COUNTER statistics to demonstrate usage of LOCKSS content.
  • Subscription Management mechanisms to integrate library catalogues with LOCKSS to aid development of archive collections.
  • Shibboleth support to cater for off-campus access by library users.
Share
Posted in News | Comments Off

UKLA Roundup: November 2012

The November 2012 roundup from the UK LOCKSS Alliance support service is now available.

This roundup highlights ongoing system and content development, and keeps members informed of the activities of EDINA and other UKLA members.

If you have comments, queries, or suggestions for future content please contact edina@ed.ac.uk.

Share
Posted in News, Support | Comments Off

LOCKSS Program endorses the KBART Recommended Practice

We are pleased to announce that the LOCKSS program now publicly endorses the KBART Recommended Practice.  Details of the LOCKSS KBART-compliant knowledge base can be found on the KBART Contacts Registry, annotated with a KBART logo to indicate our UKSG-verified compliance with the standard.

The NISO and UKSG press release with further details about the KBART initiative is copied below:

NISO and UKSG Announce Five More Publishers Endorse KBART

Metadata in OpenURL knowledge bases improved through implementation of KBART recommendations

The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and the UKSG are pleased to announce that BioOne, JSTOR, LOCKSS, the Royal Society of Chemistry and SpringerLink (hosted by Metapress) are the most recent organizations to publicly endorse the Phase I recommendations of the KBART (Knowledge Bases And Related Tools) Working Group, a joint NISO/UKSG initiative that is exploring data problems within the OpenURL supply chain. KBART’s Phase I Recommended Practice (NISO RP-9-2010), published in January 2010, contains practical recommendations for the timely exchange of accurate metadata between content providers and knowledge base developers.

All content providers, from major databases to small publishers, are encouraged to publicly endorse the KBART Recommended Practice by submitting a sample file to the KBART working group. Once the file’s format and content has been reviewed and approved, and the provider has made it publicly available (in line with the recommendations), the provider will be added to a public list of endorsing providers. Knowledge base developers can endorse the KBART Recommended Practice by confirming that their systems can process KBART formatted files. In addition, a contacts registry is available on the KBART Information Hub at www.uksg.org/kbart or www.niso.org/workrooms/kbart where content providers and knowledge base developers can register their organization’s information for downloading holdings metadata.

Sarah Price, KBART Co-chair and E-Resources & Serials Coordinator at the University of Birmingham, comments: “It’s really encouraging from both a KBART and library perspective to see the uptake of the KBART recommendations from content providers. It demonstrates the commitment to improving metadata to aid discovery which in turn will benefit the whole community through increased usage, ease of discovery and user satisfaction.”

The KBART working group is now progressing towards the end of Phase II and is focusing on enhancing the current recommendations with new guidelines for eBook, consortia and Open Access metadata.

KBART Co-chair Andreas Biedenbach, Independent Publishing Professional, concludes, “I am very pleased with the interest we have raised for our working group. It is encouraging that we find more and more organizations endorsing our recommendations and that we were able to add these renowned companies to our endorsement list this month. We look forward to collaborating with further parties involved in the e-resource metadata management in the near future and to the upcoming tasks in connection with our Phase II work.”

For more information on endorsement, to review the KBART Recommended Practice, or to find out how to get involved in future phases of KBART’s work, please visit www.uksg.org/kbart or www.niso.org/workrooms/kbart.

*About NISO*

NISO fosters the development and maintenance of standards that facilitate the creation, persistent management, and effective interchange of information so that it can be trusted for use in research and learning. To fulfill this mission, NISO engages libraries, publishers, information aggregators, and other organizations that support learning, research, and scholarship through the creation, organization, management, and curation of knowledge. NISO works with intersecting communities of interest and across the entire lifecycle of an information standard. NISO is a not-for-profit association accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). More information about NISO is available on its website: www.niso.org. For more information please contact NISO at (301) 654-2512 or via e-mail at nisohq@niso.org.

*About UKSG*

UKSG exists to connect the information community and encourage the exchange of ideas on scholarly communication. It spans the wide range of interests and activities of the extended scholarly information community of librarians, publishers, intermediaries and technology vendors. In a dynamic environment, UKSG works to:

* facilitate community integration, networking, discussion and   exchange of ideas,

* improve members’ knowledge of the scholarly information sector and support skills development,

* stimulate research and collaborative initiatives, encourage   innovation and promote standards for good practice, and

* disseminate news, information and publications, and raise awareness of services that support the scholarly information sector.

For more information, please visit the UKSG website, www.uksg.org.

 

Share
Posted in News | Comments Off

UKLA Roundup: August 2012

The August 2012 roundup from the UK LOCKSS Alliance support service is now available.

The intention of this roundup is to highlight ongoing system and content development, and to keep members informed of the activities of EDINA and other UKLA members.

Please note in particular the new documentation around integration of LOCKSS with Serials Solutions 360Link and Ex Libris’ SFX, and the spreadsheets made available as part of the content release process.

If you have comments, queries, or suggestions for future content please contact edina@ed.ac.uk.

Share
Posted in News | Comments Off

Article in DPC / DCC What’s New

Adam Rusbridge has written a short article on ‘Accessing ceased or cancelled content with LOCKSS‘ in the August 2012 edition of DPC/DCC What’s New.  The article provides an update on recent developments around link resolver integration and introduces the benefits that results from supply of access.

Share
Posted in Development, News | Comments Off

New Title List Features in version 1.55

The Title List function in your LOCKSS box allows you to report on the holdings of your LOCKSS box or the content available in the LOCKSS network as a whole. The latest release of the LOCKSS software includes some new options, and this post provides a general guide to usage of the Title List feature.

Please see the post View your holdings with LOCKSS titles export for an introduction to the Title List feature.

Title List Main Screen

Title List main screen

Basic Report Options

The main Title List screen presents you with several options for the report, described below. Note that the defaults will produce a standard KBART report, but these options allow you to customise that to better suit your needs.

Scope

This option allows you to specify the scope of the data you want to report on:

  • Available – all titles available in the LOCKSS network. This is all the content LOCKSS users can select from.
  • Configured – the titles that you have configured for collection on your institution’s machine using Add Titles.
  • Collected – the titles that have successfully collected on your machine. A title must be fully collected before it will appear in this list; partial completion is not enough.

Type

This option allows you to filter the titles to include only journals or books if you need to:

  • Journals – show only journal titles
  • Books – show only book titles (those that have an ISBN)
  • All – show all titles

Data Format

This option specifies the format of the data that is output from the reporting tool; the default Title Ranges (KBART) format displays a line for every complete range in a title, while the other options allow you to consolidate these into a single line per title.

The KBART coverage_notes field will contain a description of the complete ranges covered by each row, therefore documenting where the coverage gaps are in the consolidated formats.

  • Title Ranges – show a row for each unbroken range within a title (this is the default KBART format).
  • Titles – show a row for each title, consolidating all the individual unbroken ranges into a single range using the outermost start and end volumes. Note that the single range specified in this format may contain coverage gaps.
  • SFX DataLoader – show a row for each title, with the coverage_notes field listing coverage ranges in the SFX DataLoader format.

Output Format

This option specifies the digital format in which the report will be produced:

  • TSV – tab-separated format
  • CSV – comma-separated format
  • On-screen – the report will be turned into HTML and displayed on-screen

Having selected these options, press the List Titles button to generate the report.

A Title List report showing the customise option

The above shows the top of an HTML report. Notice there is a link to return to the main Title List page, and a button for customising the report you have generated.

Customisation Options

To provide finer-grained control over what gets into your report, there are customisation options allowing you to specify which fields to output and in what order.

Select the Customise Fields button either on the Title List screen or the HTML report screen. You will see these extra options appear at the bottom of the Title List screen:

Title List Customise

Title List customisation options

Coverage Range format

The default KBART output reports each unbroken range of a title on a separate line. Sometimes it is more useful to have a single line per title, with start and end points. The coverage_notes field is therefore used to elaborate which specific ranges are fully available within a title listed in a particular row. This field can display data in a number of formats:

  • Year Ranges – a comma-separated list of ranges, e.g. 1996-2002, 2004-2006, 2009-
  • Year(Volume) Ranges – a comma-separated list of ranges including volume in parentheses e.g. 1996(1)-2002(7), 2004(9)-2006(11), 2009(14)-
  • Year Summary – a concise format showing only the start and end of the whole range, e.g. 1996-
  • Year(Volume) Summary – a concise format showing only the start and end of the whole range, e.g. 1996(1)-
  • SFX DataLoader – this is the format defined by ExLibris for use with their SFX DataLoader utility, e.g. $obj->parsedDate(“>=”,1996,1,undef) && $obj->parsedDate(“<=”,2002,7,undef)

Note that year ranges can have an empty end point, meaning they extend to the present. The summary formats are for convenience and do not indicate where there are coverage gaps. The SFX format represents the same information as the year(volume) format but in a more verbose format.

Field Ordering

The field ordering box lists all the default KBART fields in their default order. You can edit the contents of this box to change which fields appear in the output. The ordering will also be reflected in the output report. On the right-hand side is a list of all the valid field names – be sure to include at least one of the identifying fields or there will be no way to organise the title records!

Note that the first two fields will be used to sort the resulting list.

Omit empty columns

Some columns have nothing in them due to a lack of appropriate data. Select this option to automatically omit such columns and simplify the report.

Reset/Cancel

If you decide you don’t want to customise the output after all, or have made a mistake, you can select either:

  • Reset – to reset the field ordering list to its original values
  • Cancel – to cancel customisation and go straight (back) to the report output

Finally, press List Titles to produce the report, or Hide Customise Fields to skip the customisation and use the three default report configuration options of scope, data format and output format.

Direct URL access to reports

It is possible to access a range of reports directly without manually selecting options on the Title List screen. This is useful for those applications where an automated update of the LOCKSS box’s holdings is required, for example when updating a knowledge base periodically. The default report can be retrieved by requesting the URL

http://lockss.box:8081/Titles?format=tsv

There are five configuration options for direct URL reports, which can be specified as URL parameters. The first four correspond to the basic report options described earlier:

  • format – output format: tsv, csv, html
  • scope – data scope: available, configured, collected
  • type – title type: journals, books, all
  • report – data format: kbart, titles, sfx
  • coverageNotesFormat – format for the coverage_notes field: year, year_volume, year_summary, year_volume_summary, sfx

The bare minimum is a format parameter. So for example a TSV report, in SFX report format, on titles configured in your LOCKSS box, can be retrieved from:

http://lockss.box:8081/Titles?format=tsv&report=sfx&scope=configured

Using the report

There are also several common uses for the reports generated by the Title List feature:

  • Reporting what is available on the LOCKSS network. This can be used to populate a knowledge base in a link resolver such as SFX, or cross-referenced with an institution’s subscriptions to produce a list of what should be added to LOCKSS.
  • Reporting what titles an institution has configured their LOCKSS box to collect. This can be used in institutional reporting on LOCKSS, or cross-referenced with subscriptions and available titles to find out what is missing from your configuration.
  • Reporting what has been successfully collected by LOCKSS. This report can indicate where there might be problems, or be used in institutional reporting.

We plan to produce format options for other link resolver products as necessary, though the standard KBART report should be sufficient for many applications. After the current phase of user interface development, the reports should also be useful in configuring your collection list with less manual effort.

If you have any further use cases for these reports do let us know at edina@ed.ac.uk.

Share
Posted in Content, Development, Documentation, News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off

Report on Private LOCKSS Networks

A report investigating community demand and requirements for setting up a UK Private LOCKSS Network is now available.

The report summarises a survey of members of the UK LOCKSS Alliance carried out by EDINA during October and November 2011. The survey investigated the potential value of Private LOCKSS Networks to UKLA members and focused on assessing the type of content members wish to preserve in a PLN, together with the cost and resource implications.

Agreed at the UKLA Members’ Meeting in May 2012, next steps are to prepare a short proposal identifying possible routes forward.

A Members’ Meeting of the UKLA was held in York on 10 May 2011 where attendees expressed an enthusiasm for further assessment of PLNs. The approach agreed was to conduct a survey of members to assess the level of interest for establishing a PLN, and to gather more detailed information on community requirements:  how members could envisage the PLN being structured, the content they proposed using it for, and how they expected to benefit from the PLN. A full report of this event is available on the UKLA website.  The PLN survey was carried out during October and November 2011 and focused on identifying content for preservation, costs and resources together with potential infrastructure models. The purpose of this report is to summarise the results of the survey and apply them to the various factors that need consideration when establishing a new PLN.

We would be grateful for UK HE community feedback on this report, so please either submit a comment to this post, or contact EDINA directly at edina@ed.ac.uk.

Share
Posted in Development, News, Private LOCKSS Networks | Comments Off

UKLA Roundup: June 2012

The June 2012 roundup from the UK LOCKSS Alliance support service is now available.

The intention of this roundup is to highlight ongoing system and content development, and to keep members informed of the activities of EDINA and other UKLA members.

Please note in particular the summary report and presentations from the UKLA Members’ Meeting, and the persona and requirements documents that support the ongoing user interface enhancement activity.

If you have comments, queries, or suggestions for future content please contact edina@ed.ac.uk.

Share
Posted in News | Comments Off

Understanding the Status of Titles

This post is intended to clarify the different classifications you might see for titles in your box, or titles which have been committed to the LOCKSS network.

Available, Configured & Collected

When you use the Title List feature in your LOCKSS box to report on its holdings, there are 3 options available to you that affect the scope of the report:

  • Available will include all titles available in the LOCKSS network. This is all the content LOCKSS users can select from.
  • Configured will report the titles that you have configured for collection on your institution’s machine using Add Titles.
  • Collected will report on the titles that have successfully collected on your machine.

Note that each scope is a subset of the previous one.

Committed Titles

The LOCKSS website provides a spreadsheet listing the publishers who have committed to providing their content in the LOCKSS network. This is available on the page at http://www.lockss.org/community/publishers-titles-gln and is regularly updated.

Note that content that has been committed is not instantly available in the LOCKSS network. It must be scheduled to go through a preparation and testing process that includes (a) writing a plugin which knows how to collect the content (b) testing that plugin to make sure the content collects properly. At this point the content is released to the network – the regular emails detailing new releases are the end result of this process which is perpetually being undertaken by a team of content testers in Stanford.

The spreadsheet is made by combining committed publisher data with a KBART report on Available titles from the Title List. It lists each title with the fields Publisher, Title, ISSN, eISSN, and the following fields indicate the status of each title:

  • Preserved Volumes lists the volumes that are preserved in the LOCKSS network
  • Preserved Years lists the years that are preserved in the LOCKSS network
  • In Progress Volumes lists the volumes that are committed but have not yet cleared the testing process
  • In Progress Years lists the years that are committed but have not yet cleared the testing process

Years and volumes are listed as one or more ranges separated by semi-colons. In some cases the data are not available for one reason or another. The fact that data are missing does not necessarily indicate that the title is not released.

We hope this outline of title statuses will aid institutions in making appropriate use of the reports and data available from LOCKSS boxes and the lockss.org website. Please direct any questions to edina@ed.ac.uk.

Share
Posted in Content, Documentation, Support | Tagged , , , | Comments Off